Sloto Cash

Go Back   Gambling Industry Association Forums > The Industry Playground (Public) > Industry STRAIGHT Talk!
Industry STRAIGHT Talk! This forum is strictly for current Hot Topics within the Industry.

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Display Modes

  #21  
Unread 08-23-2010, 09:52 PM
aka23 Offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by caruso View Post
"Assuming the post is truthful"? What the hell does that mean? You allow anything to be posted because it "might" be true? Is that your excuse?

You have false allegation after false allegation oozing from every corner of your forum, as well as unsubstantiated, defammatory threads you are TOTALLY aware of sitting untouched. All of that you justify becuse you "assume" it's true until it's "proven" otherwise?...
As you know, I have deleted posts that attack persons without supporting evidence. In this case, evidence was included in the form of quotes and screenshots, so I allowed it and "assumed" the statements true. Even though there was supporting evidence, I did not have the whole story, as stated in my first post on this forum. So it was certainly possible for that assumption to be bad and worth mentioning so in my earlier post. If no posts were allowed unless all statements were researched to be 100% accurate without any chance of a false comment, then there would be hardly any posts.

I've explained my stance on a person posting their own emails previously. In short, it depends on whether the content violates forum rules or not. I don't recall your comment about CM, only the related comment you wrote about posting emails. I'll review.

  #22  
Unread 08-23-2010, 09:56 PM
caruso Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 345
Default

I am not a Bryan Bailey fan, in case anyone wasn't sure. We don't exchange Christmas cards.

But check this out:

Bailey is a filthy, lying xxxxx.

If you read the privacy-violating emal he's posted from Bailey (bottom of the 1st post, it takes an age to load because he's posted so many of his idiotic graphics in that thread), and also the quote at the very top, ending "...but at press time this cannot be confirmed", you'll note that what Bailey has said is actually quite truthful. There is no lie. Title? "Bryan Bailey is a filthy, lying xxxxx".

The webmaster's totally happy to let that stand unaltered. Bailey could have his ass for that.

  #23  
Unread 08-23-2010, 09:58 PM
The_CPA's Avatar
The_CPA Offline
Association Mascot!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,048
Default

Quote:
"Assuming the post is truthful"? What the hell does that mean? You allow anything to be posted because it "might" be true? Is that your excuse?

You have false allegation after false allegation oozing from every corner of your forum, as well as unsubstantiated, defammatory threads you are TOTALLY aware of sitting untouched. All of that you justify becuse you "assume" it's true until it's "proven" otherwise? That's nothing but a lame-ass excuse
I totally agree, and the only thing that does appear to be true is essentially what I told the guy in the beginning.

The casino has the right to stick to their terms, and that's what they are doing. It matters not how much you previously wagered with them and lost.
Once you lose it, it's not your money anymore.
If you're lucky enough to win some back, then you are subject to the withdrawal terms you signed up with.
Anyway, this is such a dead horse it pathetic at this point.

I'm pissed off that my 11 years of hard work and reputation is once again put in question because this classless, and verbose idiot.
__________________
Casino Player's Advocate!

  #24  
Unread 08-23-2010, 10:03 PM
The_CPA's Avatar
The_CPA Offline
Association Mascot!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,048
Default

Those threads should be chucked. They are completely defamatory, slanderous, and baseless.

Any fool can see it.
Besides, you have enough info at this point to see that Nolan!
__________________
Casino Player's Advocate!

  #25  
Unread 08-23-2010, 10:07 PM
aka23 Offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11
Default

Regarding the CM thread, I've updated the title and some of the comments.

Regarding the CPA thread, if someone shows me that the statements are false, I will delete the thread all together. Otherwise, I will assume that the statements are truthful (but may have excluded portions of the story) because of the earlier posted evidence backing the statements. This might be more appropriate to be done via PM or email.

  #26  
Unread 08-23-2010, 10:08 PM
caruso Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aka23 View Post
As you know, I have deleted posts that attack persons without supporting evidence.
And what is the "supporting evidence" for calling me "scum" and everything else you've watched that retard post about me? ...and Nick, Bailey, Webcaz etc ad inf? You remember I asked you that in private, and you said you were "happy" for it to stand?

What do you consider justification for that kind of defammation? What the fuck did I do? I'm sure you'll have no problem publically stating your reasons. Stating that Playtech software is most likely random? Asking for proof of cheating, and not BS allegations? What other hangable offences am I guilty of in your opinion? State what they are or DO YOUR JOB and address the situation.

What is the "supporting evidence" that I'm in business with CPA? Would you care to clarify that, in the spirit of your newfound integrity? I'm sure CPA would also be curious, seeing as this is almost certainly the first he's heard of it, but your favourite poster retard has been banging on with this bullshit for the past three months.

My site advertises just SIX fucking casinos. It's the single most selective site on the internet, and I am the single most selective webmaster. Yet you are happy to watch these ad hominum attacks while happily advertising the same, and more, outright crap casinos that you're allowing others to be hauled over the coals for. You have some gall.

  #27  
Unread 08-23-2010, 10:09 PM
mojo's Avatar
mojo Offline
GIA Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,754
Default

I see there is a private forum there too aka. It is my opinion that private forums and private pm's are just that. Private. If someone wanted it public, they would make it public. The trust factor is completely lost. Jmo

It is only a matter of time before BB is the subject of these attacks as well. Along with the rest of us. Including CM with that harmful title 'filthy liar' thread. MrRacetrack is a mod here and is quoted as MrRougetrack or something like that. I hope you will take action on that as well..

There is a legitimate complaint with oneclub. I believe when Pina was trying to help the casino was trying to charge an outrageous $150 fee per $1k transaction. That can add up of course. I am not sure how it turned out, no one is willing to help anymore.
__________________
Mojo

Foghorn Leghorn: Let me guess, dearie. I say. You are looking for a husband.
Prissy: Yeesss!


Gambling Mojo Casino Community!

  #28  
Unread 08-23-2010, 10:19 PM
aka23 Offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by caruso View Post
And what is the "supporting evidence" for calling me "scum" and everything else you've watched that retard post about me? ...and Nick, Bailey, Webcaz etc ad inf? You remember I asked you that in private, and you said you were "happy" for it to stand?...
Your summary of events is not accurate. If you review your PMs, you'll see I did not say anything about being happy to let it stand. In fact, I did not even use the word "happy", which you put quotes around. You'll instead find my PM was extremely similar to the comments I've made in posts here, with a similar explanation about forum policies.

Also note that you started that thread by calling out Mr. NP in the main forum about a PM you received. I moved the thread off-topic to let you go back and forth without disturbing the main forums. I've deleted the thread now, as it now serves little purpose.

  #29  
Unread 08-23-2010, 10:26 PM
The_CPA's Avatar
The_CPA Offline
Association Mascot!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,048
Default

And the other do serve a purpose.
EXACTLY what would that purpose be other than to allow this idot to attack people with a pack of half truths and lies?

I sent you a PM. Maybe that will help you get the bigger picture here.
__________________
Casino Player's Advocate!

  #30  
Unread 08-23-2010, 11:10 PM
caruso Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aka23 View Post
Your summary of events is not accurate. If you review your PMs, you'll see I did not say anything about being happy to let it stand. In fact, I did not even use the word "happy", which you put quotes around. You'll instead find my PM was extremely similar to the comments I've made in posts here, with a similar explanation about forum policies.

Also note that you started that thread by calling out Mr. NP in the main forum about a PM you received. I moved the thread off-topic to let you go back and forth without disturbing the main forums. I've deleted the thread now, as it now serves little purpose.
My memory is quite accurate - yours is not. I did NOT start the thread. YOU started it, by removing a post I made and creating a new thread. At least get the facts right, though none of that addresses the issue of your deplorable level of non-moderation.

You said, to paraphrase precisely, that you considered the word "scum" to be "mild". What more does anyone need to know? Most forum mods would consider this kind of abuse reason for deletion. To you it is "mild". Good grief. What do you consider excessive or unacceptable?

What about the "allegation" that I am in business with CPA? How many times have you read that crock of unsubstantiatable BS and allowed it to stand? Or all the other BS attacks I asked you above to justify your comfort with? You know as well as anyone that in reasonable society a "discussion" does not descend to that level of profanity and accusation, but you are quite happy to let it stand on your forum.

It's your choice. You trade the risk you run of one day falling victim to a defammation / copyright / privacy violation suit against the value you get to your traffic and profit from that sort of material's public posting. Maybe you'll swerve it, or maybe you'll be getting something through your letterbox in a day or so. People know what you're about now, and you're not going to get away with it much longer I suspect, unless you fix the problem.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:55 PM.

Sloto Cash

vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All Rights Reserved. GamblingIndustryAssociation.com 2006